> It is interesting that a tool to
> actually reduce the liberty of the users
> as this one is under the GPL... Maybe
> the Author wants to improve Open Source,
> helping to avoid reversing... :)
Sorry, I haven't seen your post earlier...
The reason why I begun working on that is that the company I'm working for doesn't offer the sources of their products. We've been using RetroGuard to protect our code, but it lacked some features we urgently needed so I implemented them.
RetroGuard is an open-source software tool so we have to give the changed sources back to the public so that everyone can profit :-)