Re: some points still missing
> % Why not? If executable size is a
> % problem, you can 'strip' them.
> What about leave the default build
> without '-g' and create a debug rule for
> people who will do debugging ? Most
> users don't even know what's strip.
> They only need a working and fast
100% true. Even as a developer, I've only used -g while debuging an app. Never for production releases.