Re: fundamental errors with QT
> (2) Releasing it under a Dual license
> QPL, GPL.
> Why not license a "library" under the
> LGPL? or BSD? Obviously it was there
> strategy on the Windows platform side of
> things, keep it closed and make more
> money off it.
Oooh, how *dare* they, trying to make money off
This encourages people to do one of two things -
port the GPL version themselves (as is happening), or
use the free version on a free OS. GPL instead of
LGPL/BSD was also a very good decision, which protects
TT's IP, while bolstering the open-source community.
Re: QT as GPL
> Anyone considered such a project?
Such a project is already underway - check out <a