> Travis is kind of right - it's not too
> slow.... however.....
> Correct me if I'm wrong but, I think the
> point is that if this was programmed as
> a native linux app, it would be
> blisteringly fast compared to this
> Don't you agree?
> % % Slow as hell. How do you really
> % % make such a bad product? Don't you
> % have
> % % money to make an full-linux app
> % instead
> % % of porting Windoze one?
> % %
> % % One nonte: this programm needs at
> % % least a 700 Mhz machine to be run
> % % nicely.
> % %
> % % bye
> % c'mon it isn't that slow, I have a
> % mhz machine and it ran pretty decent.
> % Although the app is a little slow on
> % start, it ran fine for me, maybe yall
> % should check you OS configurations.
Wow, it's been about a year and a half now since I made that comment. I agree completely with Matt, it would be much faster if it was a native application. I guess my last post was mainly me just venting on someone for whining about IBM not investing money in something so he could get it for free. In my mind they met us halfway.
Re: kde 3
> kde3 makes windoze xp look like shit and
> if you dont like it cause its
> "heavy" go out and buy a real
> computer with a little ram and you
> should be ok. all the dumb asses who are
> in love with blackbox run ghetto
> computers just buy a decent computer and
> run kde. blackbox sucks
moron.... plain and simple, or better yet ... Ghetto Moron