Comments for KDE
08 Oct 2009 11:46
Are the constant program crashes and glitches still an issue with this desktop environment?
Roberto Rossi
28 Jul 2005 09:32
great desktop shell but..
I've switched backwards and forwards between KDE and enlightenment/fluxbox for a long time now. KDE is a wonderful project and I think it's second to none in terms of features and integration.
I hope that the 3.4.2 release provides an experience that is not as bug ridden as the 3.4.1 release. I have considered every release of KDE so far to be too frustrating to be able to use for any length of time due to constant program crashes and glitches.
04 Oct 2004 19:54
Awesome desktop
I usualy swap between kde and fluxbox. I use kde if i want to show off my system, and i use flux all the rest of the time. kde is good, everything is integrated so well that it makes it extreamly easy to use. it is also endlessly configurable, and extreamly easy to do so. i probably would use kde more if i hadnt had so many problems with it. but all in all i feel it is a great desktop and has an excelent community and choice of software
12 Mar 2004 09:38
.
nice. thx
26 Nov 2003 11:36
Why not?
Free, and great material. Why not?
27 Oct 2003 11:53
kde is easy to get used to
getting used to the look and feel is easy
12 Mar 2003 17:26
!
free is good.
28 Jan 2003 07:39
Re: KDE looks like Windows? So what?
Besides the menu, you can change the behavior and look of KDE3 easily even be changed. As far as GNOME, I used it to begin with but you have to use alot of KDE proggies and has more restriction on what you can change.
> I really don't get this.
> Just because KDE looks alot like Windows
> 9x, many of you geeks automatically
> hates it. Why? i
> Don't get me wrong, I am too sick and
> tired of Windows 9x, and is today very
> pleased with KDE on my Linux box, but I
> really don't get it when many of you
> with GNOME or just console despise KDE,
> just because it looks like Windows 9x.
> What kind of argument is that? It does
> _not_ function like Windows 9x, and it
> looks nice. That's the reasons (I guess)
> why people use it.
> Winblows isn't ugly. Too bad it sucks.
>
> Ps.: Hey, don't you think it's even more
> humiliating for Microsoft to to watch a
> non-profit organization make a desktop
> environment so like Windows 9x and still
> so much better, than just an OS? ;p
>
> Pps.: Isn't Qt opensource now?
07 Jun 2002 22:26
Re: kde 3
> kde3 makes windoze xp look like shit and
> if you dont like it cause its
> "heavy" go out and buy a real
> computer with a little ram and you
> should be ok. all the dumb asses who are
> in love with blackbox run ghetto
> computers just buy a decent computer and
> run kde. blackbox sucks
I happen to like my ghetto computer. And if you want to run KDE as a window manager that’s fine with me. But before you start making comments as to why people run blackbox I would suggest that your read this fine gem of a book "Design of the Unix Operating System" by Marice J. Bach. Then you may start to understand why people don't like “all in one software” (KDE, GNOME...). If you want integrated software then maybe another platform whose name I won't mention would better suit you.
Simply the most powerful. the most advanced and very beautiful desktop environment. I also like it how much customizable it all is.