Comments for Easy Integrity Check System
21 Jun 2004 02:09
Re: Interesting project.
> Hi! Interesting work. Good idea to use
> openssl
> for digests.
>
> As I understand you use own database
> format,
> to store file data (checksums,stat
> information,etc.).
>
> It may be interesting for you:
>
>
> osec - it's mine integrity checker, that
> uses CDB
> for database. CDB works faster then
> others.
>
>
Thank you for your comment. The reason I use my own database is that it allows me to store the data as compact as possible and also allows me to control better what is stored. I'm sure the CDB system is fast and everything, but I doubt it comes any faster since I preload everything into memory before starting to process. The in-memory data is stored in more or less efficient hashtable allowing near O(1) acccess times.
21 Jun 2004 01:54
Interesting project.
Hi! Interesting work. Good idea to use openssl
for digests.
As I understand you use own database format,
to store file data (checksums,stat
information,etc.).
It may be interesting for you:
osec - it's mine integrity checker, that uses CDB
for database. CDB works faster then others.
Re: Interesting project.
>
>
> Thank you for your comment. The reason I
> use my own database is that it allows me
> to store the data as compact as possible
> and also allows me to control better
> what is stored. I'm sure the CDB system
> is fast and everything, but I doubt it
> comes any faster since I preload
> everything into memory before starting
> to process. The in-memory data is stored
> in more or less efficient hashtable
> allowing near O(1) acccess times.
CDB mmap() all data into memory, so it's fast
enough.
This is very efficient, 'cause it is a Constant
(Read-only or Write-only).
It also uses hashtable to made access faster.
Size of database is small, cause it have
read-only/write-only design.