Comments for dotproject
18 Dec 2007 13:19
Re: Practically useless
> Too bad MS Project Server is that
> expensive...
>
>
Anything in particular about it that you found wanting? Your comment otherwise is not very constructive.
18 Dec 2007 12:42
Practically useless
Too bad MS Project Server is that expensive...
20 Nov 2004 10:59
Not quite ready
looks like a very promising start. however, the current version 1.0.2 does not fully implement task dependancies properly. for example if Task A must be finished before Task B and Task A's end date changes you must manually update Task B. Without this functionality dotproject turns into a glorified todo list. In fact, the development team doesn't use start and end dates at all for there own tasks on dotproject itself.
08 Jan 2004 21:01
Worth another look
If you have been wondering what has been happening on this project, there is a new admin team, a new set of developers, new translations and a new focus on improving and expanding dotproject.
Work is starting apace on 1.1, with an all new permissions system and a number of other improvements. There will also likely be an interim 1.0.2 release out in the next few weeks.
08 Jan 2004 00:03
Re: good program But ...missing LICENSE file.
Its in docs/LICENSE.txt
> Just can't find the License file among
> source files,
> is that mean I can create my own BSD
> license, need
> advise .
>
> thanks,
07 Jan 2004 23:48
Re: I'm in.
The project has not stopped, and is now back in full development swing. Release 1.0.1 is out, and there is a pending 1.0.2 release. 1.1 is now in planning.
If you have forked a project I'd be interested in finding out details of how far you got. Since we are in planning any improvements you would like to suggest will be most welcome.
Adam Donnison, admin for DotProject
> Let's do it. Looks like it's time for a
> fork and a new project to be formed. I'd
> really like to help this get going.
>
>
> % I am interested in helping out with a
> % bit of admin work or coding work too.
>
> % It seems this project has stopped
> since
> % 2001... anyone has the time and
> % interested in getting some things
> % organised?
> %
> % Anson
> % ansonlau@dreambox.com.au
>
>
>
10 Jul 2003 11:37
Outstanding!!
Check it out at....
28 Jun 2002 09:36
New group working
There is a new group working in sourceforge.net/projec....
See "Forums" -> "Dotproject: dot dot dot"
20 Jun 2002 14:59
Re: I'm in.
Let's do it. Looks like it's time for a fork and a new project to be formed. I'd really like to help this get going.
> I am interested in helping out with a
> bit of admin work or coding work too.
> It seems this project has stopped since
> 2001... anyone has the time and
> interested in getting some things
> organised?
>
> Anson
> ansonlau@dreambox.com.au
Costing
Hi,
I dloaded the latest version. Looks promising except on one area. Instead of calculating the cost from the users table, the cost is calculated from the cost code. And estimated cost is not automatically filled in the project area, with respect to the no. of tasks, users allocated (and the associated cost)and time period of the tasks. In the same way the actual cost is not calculated from the task log and actual time spent by the resources by the users and their relative cost. Or am I missing something?
I would love to have a two gantt bars, one representing the planned one, the other showing the actual one, so that I can compare my project delays.