Projects / curator / Comments

Comments for curator

15 Mar 2002 10:18 branch32

This is one for the toolbox
I made the mistake of running curator on a large directory with several hundred 1+MB images and found that it took several minutes to discover that the program worked without error.

The beauty of the tool is that it generates HTML code and it does not require any tools other than a web browser to view the output -- no cgi scripts, no databases, just HTML. This is of interest to me since I wish to post some images on a web site that I have no administrative rights to. It is also good for CD archives, as the author correctly points out, since HTML is a common denominator and should work for a long time to come.

The problems encounterd by "too raw" look to be the result of using the program with a Python version less than 2.0. I had the same result on my Redhat 7.1 machine even though I had installed Python 2.1.1. The RPM I used for Python 2.1.1 installed Python2 in the /usr/bin directory, but the link between python and python2 had to be created manually.

The program is fully documented in the script -- simply redirect (curator --help > readme.txt) since it is several pages long.

I would like to have seen a "curator <source_dir> <dest_dir>" format with an option to resize the original images to a uniform size instead of the "cd <source_dir>; curator" format that was coded, but that is being picky.

02 Dec 2001 00:06 greenmoss

Re: This is too raw!

> Crash boom! I can't be bothered with
> this!
>
> Maybe a few more versions, some docs,
> a rpm or tar
> ball and example of how to use it?


You raise some reasonable questions, but why not try posing them in a more respectful way to the programmer? He would probably be much more receptive to answering your questions and resolving possible future issues if you didn't say things like "I can't be bothered with this".

29 Oct 2001 20:52 blais

Re: This is too raw!
What version do you have?

Can't you send me an email instead of logging in a comment on the friggin' app.index page?

Can you try running the interpreter explicitly, perhaps the old python1.5 is still before 2.1 in your path?


The home page is full of information! Did you at least go there??? YOu know, the link just above in this page?

There is even a big link to the SOURCEFORGE BUG TRACKING system from the web page, you know, where it says "reporting bugs". Isn't it obvious enough?

29 Oct 2001 20:10 vegaspctech

Re: This is too raw!

>
> % Hi,
> %
> % Found this software sketchy and
> % couldn't get it to
> % work!
>
>
> You have one gzipped file to download,
> then you can cd into your image
> directory and run the script without
> arguments and it should do its work.
>
> Now, that being said, the web page
> states clearly that you do need to have
> Python 2.1.x and ImageMagick. Moreover,
> using --help you can get a list of all
> the options that the script takes.


Assuming it works. It didn't for Mr. McTernan
and it hasn't yet for me. I have Python 2.1.1
and ImageMagick 5.2.7 and I get:

curator --help
File "/usr/bin/curator", line 216
from os.path import join as pjoin
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax


>
> I really don't see how simpler I could
> distribute or program this thing. There
> is a web page with lots of info.
> Besides, how could you have found it
> sketchy if you couldn't figure out how
> to run it? How am I supposed to support
> those users who can't figure out how to
> run a simple ONE-FILE script and go and
> whine about it on FM? Please log a
> support request in the SF tracker, and I
> shall help you there.
>


I'm remembering something about flies, honey and
vinegar. ;-) I might consider logging a request
in the 'SF tracker' if I knew what the heck it
is. A readme file wouldn't hurt. Nor would a
link to whatever is the 'SF tracker.'
Information is like money. Seldom do people
complain about having too much.

13 Sep 2001 16:09 michaelmcternan

Re: This is too raw!


>
> % Hi,
> %
> % Found this software sketchy and
> % couldn't get it to
> % work!
>
>
> You have one gzipped file to download,
> then you can cd into your image
> directory and run the script without
> arguments and it should do its work.


Okay, so my browser unzipped it for me adding to
confusion. But I was then lost (having dialup I needed
something other than an online page). A README or
INSTALL would have been good (c'mon it will take like
3 minutes!).


Oh, and it didn't work out of the box.


> Now, that being said, the web page
> states clearly that you do need to have
> Python 2.1.x and ImageMagick. Moreover,
> using --help you can get a list of all
> the options that the script takes.


Ahh. I have Python 1.5.2 as came with RedHat 7.1


> I really don't see how simpler I could
> distribute or program this thing. There
> is a web page with lots of info.
> Besides, how could you have found it
> sketchy if you couldn't figure out how
> to run it?


That is my point. I couldn't figure it out and I couldn't
find any help without going online again.

I think I suggested making an RPM before.... It can
check for dependencies and ensure the system it is
being installed to is sane and has the correct setup.


> How am I supposed to support
> those users who can't figure out how to
> run a simple ONE-FILE script and go and
> whine about it on FM? Please log a
> support request in the SF tracker, and I
> shall help you there.


I don't want support. Your project has consumed too
much of my time/bandwidth.... there are others that
are better at this point in time.

My point is that you have to give people more than
ONE-FILE script, because if it doesn't work, what are
you left with?

RE: Whining on FM... what are the comment for then?

Good luck with future versions.


>
>

12 Sep 2001 16:44 blais

Re: This is too raw!

> Hi,
>
> Found this software sketchy and
> couldn't get it to
> work!


You have one gzipped file to download, then you can cd into your image directory and run the script without arguments and it should do its work.

Now, that being said, the web page states clearly that you do need to have Python 2.1.x and ImageMagick. Moreover, using --help you can get a list of all the options that the script takes.

I really don't see how simpler I could distribute or program this thing. There is a web page with lots of info. Besides, how could you have found it sketchy if you couldn't figure out how to run it? How am I supposed to support those users who can't figure out how to run a simple ONE-FILE script and go and whine about it on FM? Please log a support request in the SF tracker, and I shall help you there.

01 Sep 2001 12:20 michaelmcternan

This is too raw!
Hi,

Found this software sketchy and couldn't get it to
work!

It was unclear that I was downloading a single script
(which has no accompanying readme etc... just info in
the top of the file) and then it didn't work....

[mm7323@localhost curator]$ ./curator-1.0.2
File "./curator-1.0.2", line 210
from os.path import join as pjoin
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
[mm7323@localhost curator]$

Crash boom! I can't be bothered with this!

Maybe a few more versions, some docs, a rpm or tar
ball and example of how to use it?

Mike


Screenshot

Project Spotlight

ReciJournal

An open, cross-platform journaling program.

Screenshot

Project Spotlight

Veusz

A scientific plotting package.