Projects / Atmail / Comments

Comments for Atmail

10 Jun 2014 18:13 snakedewd

Download page redirects to demo page. There seems to be no download, only a very expensive (ANNUAL) purchase.

19 May 2008 14:57 mountainash

Re: Too expensive


> Could you name a few?

http://atmail.org/ (http://atmail.org/r/) in fact.

It seems AtMail has now gone open source.

26 Jul 2006 20:37 jim_brazil

Our evaluation tests of various Webmail apps

We have evaluated an extensive set of Webmail applications on behalf of our ISP client.


The tests involved using IMP, Roundcube, Squirelmail and @Mail.


Overall @Mail stood out from the crowd for the following reasons:


* Improved user-interface over the competition. An advanced interface for IE/Firefox ( using XUL ) and a lightweight Ajax interface are included. The interfaces are very well polished


Other clients like IMP, Squirelmail have a really bad end user interface/experience. Products like Roundcube are very lightweight and not as feature rich


* Outlook sync support - This was a nice plugin, users can sync addressbook/calendar data between a desktop client and Webmail


* Good Groupware support - Nice Calendar, Task, and shared contact support. Also has free/busy support which the competition is lacking or they are poorly implemented


* Wireless interface and SMS support - Also a nice plugin that our end users enjoy, which the other products don't have up to scratch


In summary there are good quality Webmail applications out there, and for our needs @Mail fit the pie best

26 Jul 2006 06:26 bpat1434

Re: Too expensive


>

> % Other viable alternatives are for

> FREE

>

>

> Could you name a few?

Roundcube - www.roundcube.net

While not as fully featured as @mail, and still in its infancy, Roundcube has to be doing well, since @mail founders are looking to get rid of Roundcube so they can have 1 less OS competitor :)

26 Jul 2006 04:32 blackhaze

Get your facts straight

As the authors of @Mail we have to disagree with your false acusations.


Firstly, @Mail does work under Suse Linux. The dependencies of the software are Apache, perl , gcc and mysql. If these are available under your OS the software can be installed.


Secondaly, the accusations of our technical team resetting root passwords, opening firewalls and exposing systems to hackers via SSH and Webmin are completely wrong. You should get your facts straight before you bad mouth a company without any backing to your claims.


Thirdly, we provide an online demo, download evaluation and a 30-day refund policy on the software. So you had plenty of opportunities to evaluate the software.

18 Jul 2006 07:50 royalpain

Another Warning
Atmail may work on some systems, as noted above. But it does not and cannot be made to work on a number of Linux systems, including SuSE SLES.<br /><br />Moreover, the company will not issue a refund for any reason; and if you make the mistake of paying them to do the install, as I did, they will reset your firewall to give themselves permanent access, give themselves Root User access and, if they know you system cannot be made to work, will then expose it to hackers with SSH and Webmin. If you run Webmin (Perl) do not even consider giving them access. <b>Be very careful with these folks! Only a fraud action gets their attention after they have your money.</b>

27 Jul 2005 14:15 silvex

Re: Unsatisfactory Demonstration of RDBMS Connectivity

> All problems have been finally been
> resolved. We have adopted the product,
> and we are hosting 400K+ email accounts
> using an Oracle database and Linux SMTP,
> POP3, and HTTP servers.


Would you be kind enough to share your gripes about atmail. We are considering it for our IMAP/SMTP/POP3 solution for 150K users.

I tried the demo on Solaris and could not make it to run. After installing Fedora Core4 on a HP DL360 it ran rather quickly.

Althought they need a MUCH better documentation to set it up. PLUS a much needed admin guide.

Does it uses the MySQL/Oracle for passwords only ? Or does it stores users email too?

thanks,

Ed Silva
esilva@silvex.com


27 Jun 2005 00:53 smoku

Re: Too expensive


> Other viable alternatives are for FREE

Could you name a few?

02 Mar 2004 08:42 joebenslc

Re: Unsatisfactory Demonstration of RDBMS Connectivity
We are using atmail as for web based email and need to offer pop accounts also. I would appreciate some advice. What pop/smtp server are you using ? How do you handle email relay?


Thanks,

Joe

04 Sep 2003 14:51 juliensorel

Re: Evaluation does not contain templates in other languages
Sorry for my last message, should've read the docs... BTW, if you have the same problem, check lang.pl.

Screenshot

Project Spotlight

ReciJournal

An open, cross-platform journaling program.

Screenshot

Project Spotlight

Veusz

A scientific plotting package.